vol. 2
More random files. These are all from the second half of the alphabet. A by-the-book musical starring a Big Star, and earning said Big Star her second Tony Award, and based on a classic 1942 film starring Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn? Check. A rarely-performed Ibsen that had me mesmerized? And, yes, I said Ibsen. Check. A musical about Oz and witches, based on a best-selling novel? Check. An insanely funny, very British play about snooker? Check. A comedy hit in London that had me giggling with glee on the Isla Verde beach, but which, oddly and unexpectedly, didn't translate as well as I thought it would on the Chicago Shakespeare stage? Check. A musical about some devilishly entertaining goings-on in Eastwick, Rhode Island, based on the hit movie and novel of the same name, that has, puzzlingly, yet to receive a Broadway production and likely never will? Check. Fix a cuppa and let's begin!
WOTY
and the Tonys: It's no secret that the Tony Awards aren't
always won because the winners are the best in their categories. Actually,
this is true with all awards contests. Sometimes sentimentality plays a
part. Sometimes the winners are current Flavors-of-the-Month. And sometimes
it's because the winner is the best of an unimpressive lot. Take the 1980-1981
season, Woman of the Year's season. The David Merrick/Gower Champion smash 42nd Street won, unsurprisingly, the
Best Musical Tony in a field that included Sophisticated
Ladies, Tintypes, and Woman of the
Year. In this case, the other nominees really didn't have a chance over the
enormous sentimental value attached to the death of Gower Champion on the day his
final show, 42nd Street, opened on
Broadway. (And let's be fair here. 42nd
Street is quintessential musical theatre and probably would have won in any
season.) But WOTY walked away with
four Tonys, two more than the Tony-winning Best Musical, two performance Tonys
(for Lauren Bacall and Marilyn Cooper) and two creative ones for book and
score. For Best Book, WOTY's
competition included 42nd Street,
which was less of an actual character-driven book and more of a device to get
to the next song, Tintypes, and,
curiously, The Moody Shapiro Songbook,
a one-performance flop. The best of the lot, Peter Stone collected a Tony for WOTY. For Best Score, Kander and Ebb
were up against Charlie and Algernon
(17 performances), Copperfield (13
performances), and Shakespeare's Cabaret
(54 performances). Again, the strongest in a weak field, Kander and Ebb
collected their second, of three, Tony Awards for Best Score. (Their other wins
were for Cabaret and Kiss of the Spider Woman, both superior
scores.)
Wicked in Chicago: A sold-out six-week engagement led immediately to a sit-down run, the likes of which had not been seen in Chicago before or since. It ran just over 3 ½ years and, in all likelihood, could have continued its run for at least another 3 ½ years. (By comparison Hamilton's Chicago residency was a mere 3 ¼ years.) Touring productions have returned twice to Chicago for short, but sold-out runs. The musical, in New York, in London, and on the road, shows no signs
of slowing down, at least pre-pandemic.
It may well run until the next millennium.
September,
2018. Preview. Luxe set, sumptuous costumes, atmospheric live music, effective
lighting, and solid acting throughout were all derailed by static, dull
direction by Christopher Luscombe that basically ignored 2/3 of the house,
especially the right side where we were seated, and staged the show as though
the Shakes' Courtyard Theater were a proscenium house. This meant we missed a
lot of facial expressions, gestures, and saw a lot of backs. Scarlett Strallen
as the title character was charm personified, though her cockney was a little
too thick at times and I missed more than a few of her lines. Big props go to
Natalie West as Nancy in a lovely performance full of sardonic humor and
attitude. The singular Hollis Resnik, in two small roles, almost stole the show,
and just for the record, her cockney was intelligible throughout her scene as
Nell's mum. I read this play the previous February on the beach in Isla Verde
and absolutely loved it. So much so that I told Bob he simply had to direct this ASAP. I'm sad to report
I wasn't much in love with it in its American premiere at the Shakes. Perhaps
it's one of those pieces that reads better than it plays. But I suspect, in a
proscenium house or with a director who knew how to stage in a thrust
environment, I would have felt differently. Didn't hate it, but… - at the Chicago Shakespeare Theater, Chicago
Hello, Broadway? The
Witches of Eastwick
received mixed to positive notices on its London opening, especially positive
for its leading ladies. But the 2100-seat Drury Lane proved too large to bring
in profitable houses week and after week, so after nine months, it received a
scenic slimming-down, a few revisions here and there, and reopened at the
1200-seat Prince of Wales Theatre, overall a better fit for the show. Popular
enough for a respectable seventeen-month run, it nevertheless closed at a loss.
It received its American premiere in 2007 at Arlington, Virginia's Signature
Theatre, and despite fine reviews and rumors that the show was Broadway-bound,
it never made it there, and has for all intents and purposes disappeared from
the American musical theatre scene. In fact, the only show of Americans Dempsey
and Rowe to have any real play in the States has been their late-1990s Zombie Prom. But Broadway isn't the
be-all-to-end-all, and The Witches of
Eastwick has enjoyed a post-West End life that includes productions in
Australia, Russia, Brazil, Poland, Norway, Austria, Slovenia, the Czech
Republic, a couple of UK tours, and a short run in 2014 at Maine's Ogunquit
Playhouse. Broadway remains elusive, probably always will, and The Witches of Eastwick doesn't figure
on America's musical theatre radar. And that, folks, is America's musical
theatre's loss.
© 2021 Jeffrey Geddes